Subscribe to Posts
Subscribe to CommentsYour job, young pastor, is to maintain a non-anxious presence within the church you pastor. Knowing that we live in a time when anxiety is everywhere–a time when religion, in particular, has been whipped into a paralyzing frenzy of anxiety by those who are served by fear. Easier said than done, maintaining a non-anxious presence. Where to begin? Befriend the book of Psalms.
Read the rest of this entry »
Advice to young pastors: When someone with a major media platform like Pat Roberston asserts that Haiti’s founders made a pact with the devil, we’re not supposed to just swallow the assertion whole. It’s an extraordinary assertion, composed of four extraordinary necessities: 1.) that such a pact was actually made; 2.) that those who made it were authorized to act on behalf of the entire nation; 3.) that it’s being made by those authorized to enter into such a pact actually bound Haiti spiritually for the next 200 years (at least); 4.) that it had anything whatsoever to do with the recent earthquake. So far as I know, there’s no historical evidence that such a pact was made in the first place. A Haitian pastor with the Church of God, Jean R. Gelin, Ph.D, did his homework and could not come up with any credible historical source for the claim. And that’s just the first first of the four necessities. Why do we fall for these things?
Read the rest of this entry »
Every systematic theology, every air-tight system, every completely consistent view of the bible, every logically constructed and perfectly put together faith, crashes like waves on the shoreline of God. Because the Bible is not the system in written form and the system, once “discovered” (read: invented) is not the solution. The Bible is a living, breathing, personal witness to a living, breathing, personal God, with whom we have to do. This is what drives us crazy about the God revealed in the Bible–a God of mystery, paradox, plain speech, simple commands, subtly, a.k.a. a personal God: a someone with whom we have to do. Directly. Last night I went to sleep dreaming-praying…
Read the rest of this entry »
I’ve owed you this post for a while. Yes, I have a pebble in my shoe over the current state of the American evangelical movement of which my tribe, the Vineyard, is a part. Yes, I think Phariseeism is alive and well in evangelicalism. I’d call my own out if I saw it, but others are free to do so in the comments section. And yes, I’m bored by Christians who call out the sins of the world like it’s a worthwhile hobby. Or like it’s news. Been there, done that. Spent fifteen years of my life in that mode, and I guess I got it off my chest. I can imagine being wearied by this–hearing this, reading this– just as I am wearied, but not so much to stop. So the first of a two-parter: evangelicals at our best (to be followed by evangelicals at our worst.)
Well I’ve gone and made a few of you nervous, which means we’ve got a good conversation going about Jesus and Paul and understanding this book that is so important to us or we wouldn’t bother. In some of the comments to my previous post I detected a certain unease about the idea that there might be any difference in the relative weight or significance of various biblical writers or books in the Bible. As if any suggestion of such a difference entailed a rejection of parts of the received text of Scripture.
Read the rest of this entry »
Carl Safina, an environmental scientist and science writer of some note, spoke at the Vineyard Church of Ann Arbor two weeks ago. Our first secular scientist as a speaker–a man who professes no Christian faith, but is an admirer of Jesus of Nazareth along with Charles Darwin. He was nervous to be speaking to a congregation in the evangelical wing of American Christianity. He was nervous as one might be who is crossing a minefield without knowing where the mines are located. Would he offend people without even intending to? Would he get me into trouble with congregants by what he might say? I told him not to be nervous: we wanted to hear what he had to say about the oceans and science and the environment. Tell us what you know. But I was nervous too.
Read the rest of this entry »
Sola Jesus rather than sola scriptura is the scriptural sola. By asserting Sola Jesus one is honoring, not denigrating Scripture. What is the purpose of Scripture according to Scripture? Careful. The statement of a thing’s purpose sets the trajectory for our understanding of the thing and must be carefully stated. Is the purpose of Scripture simply to lead and guide us, as a text might lead and guide us? To exercise authority over us? We read, agree, and do, as though we were reading an instruction manual for life? Or is the purpose of Scripture to reveal Jesus who leads and guides us?
Read the rest of this entry »
I wonder if we’ve had the emphasis on the wrong syllable on the pressing issue of authority. Speaking big picture, long time frame here. The church at it’s inception had one creed: Jesus is Lord. Simple. All authority in heaven and on earth given to him, Jesus. What rolls off our tongue like a tired chorus, was, on their lips, incendiary. Jesus is Lord and Caesar is not, and Apollos is not and Astarte is not and the moon and the sun and the stars are not….and the powers and principalities that hold sway in this world are not. Every knee shall bow before the One not the many, not the several, not the few.
Read the rest of this entry »
Something is happening. After centuries wrestling with the “doctrine of biblical inspiration” believers have worked themselves into an exhausted lethargy about this book. We’ve been so busy either debunking or defending it, that we’ve forgotten to simply enter it on it’s own terms to know what punch it packs. But what I see happening is a growing body of people who have no dog in that old fight. They don’t approach the Bible with any pre-conceived notions about its inspiration or lack thereof. They could care less about words like inerrancy or form criticism. They may be completely uninformed about the Jesus seminar and reactions to it. They are outside the camp of insitutional religion, but not outside the reach of Jesus. They are simply readers without rubrics, responding to the text as it is given to them and they are as disparate a group as Reynolds Price, the novelist, Leon Kass, the bio-ethicist at University of Chicago and Layzie Bone, the rapper.
Read the rest of this entry »
Maybe you noticed my silence of late in the blogging department. I was listening in to the conversation prompted by the previous post, between Brenda, Archie, Billabong, Trenton, Metler and others. People want to talk to each other about these things don’t they? They want to convince each other, poke, and prod, question and offer themselves in response to each other. At stake in the conversation were questions of who gets to lead and why, who’s in and who’s out, what the gospel is and isn’t, and how we are to understand and engage the Bible. Since the Bible touches on all the Big Questions–life and death and immortality among others–there is plenty to get worked up over in a conversation like this. So now I want to ask, what would please Jesus in these matters?
Read the rest of this entry »
