carl safina hits the ball out of the park at the ann arbor vineyard

Carl Safina, an environmental scientist and science writer of some note, spoke at the Vineyard Church of Ann Arbor two weeks ago.  Our first secular scientist as a speaker–a man who professes no Christian faith, but is an admirer of Jesus of Nazareth along with Charles Darwin.  He was nervous to be speaking to a congregation in the evangelical wing of American Christianity. He was nervous as one might be who is crossing a minefield without knowing where the mines are located.  Would he offend people without even intending to? Would he get me into trouble with congregants by what he might say?  I told him not to be nervous: we wanted to hear what he had to say about the oceans and science and the environment.  Tell us what you know.  But I was nervous too.

There were a few raised eyebrows within the church community–not many, but some: Why have you invited a man with no faith to speak at church?   More troubling were the comments to my blog post about the visit before it took place.  I didn’t post them as I didn’t have the heart to. One was a “prophetic denunciation”–how God was angered by the invitation, etc.; another was also in the  “guardian of orthodoxy” vein reminding me that “The fool says in his heart, ‘there is no God’”–a reference to the good scientist.  (As though this is the proper use of the Bible: finding a way to use it to call a person a fool. Jesus could use the Bible every moment of every day to call each one of us, “Fool!” but he doesn’t.  Maybe we shouldn’t.)

The way the brain works, these comments have their impact. They get the “alarm” part of the brain going, stimulating fear–just reading the words does that. It takes five encouraging words to match the impact of one “You’re an idiot!” comment.  That’s just the brain doing its brain thing.

no good reason not to

But I never doubted it was the right thing to do. Who wants to be part of church that can’t do such a thing?  Not me.  Our church, the Ann Arbor Vineyard, and the Blue Ocean Institute, which Safina co-founded, are sponsors of The Friendship Collaborative bringing together evangelical pastors and secular scientists to talk about our shared concern for the environment.  The only reason not to invite Carl to speak would have been fear–overblown, exaggerated, disproportionate fear–or worse, distrust. Who wants to distrust the church one attends and pastors? Who wants to believe the worst, not the best about her? Not me.

Carl was warmly welcomed at the first service, so he relaxed for the second. Both were dynamite. The man has great comic timing. He knows his stuff but can tell it to people who don’t as if they are intelligent too. And Safinas has a heart–a big, kind, caring one. What’s not to like?  His presentation was a little longer at the second service, so when it was done, I jumped up on the platform, my back to the congregation, and conferred with Mike Brooks, our worship pastor about how to use the time remaining.  When I turned to face the congregation, they were standing up, cheering for Carl. He was standing there, stunned and deeply moved.   Then Mike Brooks invited to him to play drums in the worship band for the final song–Long Train Runnin’ by the Doobie Brothers. How apt.

find a carl safina to adopt

What if every evangelical church in the United States adopted a secular scientist?  The pastor and the scientist would get to know each other and if a relationship of mutual respect were established the pastor would invite the scientist to speak to the church.  Tell us what you think we need to hear about the natural world as you understand it through the lens of the scientific method.  Don’t worry about offending us, just tell us the truth of the world as you know it.  Sell us your book if it can be read by someone without a Ph.D.

What if the church listened to the scientist?  What if they listened to the secular scientist as they would want all secular scientists to listen to them?  What if they applied what Jesus called, “The Law and the Prophets” (do unto others as you would have them do unto you) to the scientist?

What if the church welcomed the scientist?  By that I mean, what if the church extended the hospitality that Jesus extended to people on the outside of faith looking in, in the way that Jesus extended it?  Let’s share a meal together, you and I, as though we were already friends–while the righteous gnash their teeth at us both.

What if the church were not afraid of what the scientist had to say?  What if the church trusted Jesus to help them separate the wheat from the chaff, just as must be done when anyone speaks, including (especially?) the pastor?

There would be no need to put out the porcupine quills.  The defensive pricklies would be left at home.

oh for the day when this is not noteworthy!

Here’s what I long for–the day when this is not noteworthy.  I long for the day when the church begins to tackle the question of our times: “Who are the Gentiles of our day? Who are the despised of Israel (despised of God’s people) in our day?  Who are the people Jesus would extend a kingdom welcome to without pre-conditions today–a welcome so in keeping with the kingom that the righteous would gnash their teeth as they did in the day of his coming?”

If you are interested in Safina’s take on the experience, check out his blog.

If you were there when Dr. Safina spoke to us, and were moved by the experience, leave us a comment.

If you are the pastor of an evangelical church and you would like to explore the idea of adopting a secular scientist, contact me.  If you leave a coment, I think I can email you directly. Depending on where you’re from, I can give you a few names of scientists who might welcome an invitation, so long as you’re willing to give ‘em “The Law and the Prophets” treatment, a.k.a, the golden rule, which is, according to Jesus–well, the Bible, if I’ve got my Bible right.

ain’t it time for somethin’ NEW?

Rice Krispies go snap, crackle, pop—why not the church?

Wouldn’t it be more interesting if the church made some noise–beyond what we hear week after week?

Wouldn’t it be a sign that we were pressing into the new creation– if we actually did something NEW, unexpected, surprising?

Like this Post? Share it!
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • TwitThis
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

8 Responses to “carl safina hits the ball out of the park at the ann arbor vineyard”

  1. Joao Says:

    I liked Safina’s presentation.

    The only problem I can think of having Safina or another person who is not a Jesus follower at the pulpit on sunday morning would be that some folks would feel like they missed out on their weekly public God time. I can see how to many, this time is a special time to connect with God.
    I think perhaps having him speak at another time, perhaps a special presentation on wednesday or saturday or even sunday evening, might have met more of the congregants’ needs while at the same time providing Safina with his venue.

    I guess it depends on how one views the sunday morning service.

    I personally liked Safina’s presentation and was happy to see how the church welcomed him, I just feel a bit for those who might have preferred to hear encouragement from the scriptures during church services.

    Just my 2 pesos. No big thing.

  2. Martha Says:

    I was there. And I was really proud of my church and my pastor.

    We just got done studying Zacchaeus at my bible study this evening, and I was reminded of the way we welcomed Carl. Jesus saw an outsider who was willing to have fellowship with him and it delighted him so profoundly that it stopped him in his tracks and propelled him to approach him like family. He invited himself to Zacchaeus’ house BEFORE Zacchaeus changed anything. Zacchaeus’ change of heart was a RESPONSE to Jesus’ overture of fellowship, not a prerequisite. Presumably, Jesus still would have had supper with him if he had not repented; Zaccheaus certainly wouldn’t have been the first person Jesus would have treated like that.

    There was some discomfort in the crowd that day, too. But you’re absolutely right that most of that discomfort is likely to be based in fear. And it’s my opinion that it wasn’t inappropriate to invite Carl to speak at a service. It wasn’t like you hadn’t used any pastoral filter at all. I appreciate that you evaluated him to be a man who would be a good guest, who wouldn’t abuse the platform by being disrespectful of our faith. I appreciate being treated like a grown-up and expected to be able to discern wheat from chaff. I understand that to feel threatened is something that originates in one’s own fears and is antithetical to faith in a God who really is in charge all the time. And I appreciate being given an opportunity — by someone whose job it is to help me grow in it — to practice that kind of faith.

    It was my hope — and my experience — that Carl delivered (in his way) a word from the Lord to us. It was a real sermon, in that sense. And you’re right that the discernment one had to exercise in harvesting it wasn’t any different than the discernment one should be using every Sunday.

  3. Phil of Midland Says:

    To Ken: thanks for shunning the fear driven doubts. To Carl: thanks for risking yourself and also relationships with peers that may despise your decision to reach out to evangelicals.

    I think Jaoa brings up an interesting concern and one that I think should be addressed especially in the context of allowing scientists to have a voice in the discussion of the kingdom coming and how we as believers participate. I am often reminded of the scripture where Jesus declares that the rocks will cry out if His followers remain silent. I think we need to ask God why the crap did He bring someone who claims not to believe in Him to speak on a Sunday.

    Maybe the rocks are starting to cry out. Maybe the rocks have hearts softer than ours in certain areas and God wants us to take in an old message that has fallen to deaf ears for a while. Maybe Safina being there brought 10 students from U of M that haven’t been in a church since they were kids. Maybe God wanted to use us (the church) to extend love to someone who has been hurt by religion and feels like the thing both God and him cherish most (creation) is being neglected in large part due to religion (of the Christian variety).

    I unfortunately was out of town when Safina spoke, but the ripple effect that I am still hearing about makes me believe that God, nor the Holy Spirit took that Sunday off.

  4. Susan Says:

    I was struck by what I understood Carl’s message to be to the church – that the environmental damage to the oceans is impacting poor people all over the world and it is our job to extend help to them. Carl may or may not believe what we believe in. He seems to believe in our ability to alleviate suffering. That was brave to come speak openly about his heart for creation and the work to be done.

  5. Pastor Mike Says:

    All truth is created by God…
    is revealed by God…
    is inspired by God…
    is God-breathed…
    is God’s word…
    is God’s truth…
    is sacred.

    Amen.

  6. Shasha Says:

    Clearly, God has gifted Carl with intelligence and compassion. It was evident from his presentation that the fruits of the Holy Spirit are present in this man’s commitment to sharing his love for humanity, wildlife, and Mother Earth.

    Thank you, Ken, for bringing Carl to Vineyard.

    Thank you, Carl for your heart of gold, gift of teaching, and impulse to share your vision of a humanity that cares for all of creation.

    Shasha

  7. julie Says:

    thanks, ken, for inviting carl. thanks so much, carl, for coming. so happy to be part of this church.

  8. Steve Gray Says:

    Way to go! All truth is God’s truth. We should do this more.

    I think evangelicals worry a little when a secular person fills the pulpit. It is a slippery slope to Unitarian-ism and all that. It is so good for us to hear and understand others that do share our beliefs. Helps to drive away the fear – on both sides I think. I think it just does so much good for the cause of Christ. Let’s do it some more – but wait until I get back (July 2009).

Leave a Reply